To prove this one would need to produce a witness for x, call it m, such that M(m) is false, or, produce witnesses for x and y, call then m and d, such that D(d) and L(m,d), though you need not have M(m).Love, it seems, eludes logic.
To prove this one would need to produce a witness for x, call it m, such that M(m) is false, or, produce witnesses for x and y, call then m and d, such that D(d) and L(m,d), though you need not have M(m).
ReplyDeleteLove, it seems, eludes logic.